Daylight software review
![daylight software review daylight software review](https://www.gamegrin.com/assets/Uploads/2014/05/18/_resampled/resizedimage640360-ss-6bc2a2b647b93f41a28ae38c699ec0901d83703f.1920x1080.jpg)
![daylight software review daylight software review](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/vii3ML5vqxUCxQRCrggk3e.jpg)
When we look at the GH5 instead the GH5S does remain superior but this is due to weakness of the GH5 itself. To be perfectly honest due to the way VLOG works I did not see major benefit even when I tested the S5 because the extra DR in the highlight was not really useful.
#Daylight software review iso
So if you are not always at high ISO levels (>1600) you may be getting better value from the GH5M2 that costs less takes photos and has IBIS. It is not difficult to see that the GH5S has good performance in daylight conditions however it does not really have any edge worth investing in it for this use case. The table does not consider however that CineD2 on the GH5M2 does accomplish more than VLOG in virtue of less noise and also does not consider the fact that some of the DR will be lost in the underexposure happening behind the scenes. This is also consistent to various tests on websites like dpreview and CineD. When you look at the GH5M2 the potential benefit drops to 0.5 and under 1600 is almost zero becoming 2/3 Ev when the GH5S is in high gain. Please note this is an extrapolation I have not take measures however assuming VLOG impacts all cameras equally once gain is taken into account what you see there is that the GH5S has a potential benefit between 0.76 and 1.46 Ev over the original GH5 which is consistent with user experiences and website tests. The following table extrapolates the GH5S dynamic range considering a shift of 3dB in gain (ISO 400 -> 200 shifted) ISO Setting The potential benefit of the GH5S over other models In the second scene both cameras were maxed out and no further stretching has been done as it was not improving the scene. The footage has been stretched to maximise DR ad hoc in the first scene and hues have been corrected for daylight.
#Daylight software review full
This is the full video on youtube so you can make your own calls. Looking at the waveform after ETTR with the cameras showing near clipping you can see that the highlights are practically the same however VLOG has lower midtones and less darks. Uncorrected out of camera waveform for the GH5S exposed to the right in VLOG Uncorrected out of camera waveform for the GH5M2 exposed to the right in CineD2 Both camera had almost no tones left in the sky although they did not clip with the GH5M2 having perhaps an edge there. This is visible in the second scene where I spot metered on the subject. I would say a tad less than the GH5M2 on CineD2 at base ISO. I did not see any more dynamic range in the GH5S.The GH5S had better battery performance of the GH5M2 and I think this has to do with the LCD which is now much dimmer than the new camera as you can see in the picture.
![daylight software review daylight software review](https://us.v-cdn.net/6030815/uploads/3LWI9IQQKNVH/screenshot-20210209-190046-com-valvesoftware-android-steam-community.jpg)
On this basis I do not understand why users speak about a magenta cast in some shots.